Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +52%
1.828 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV770
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy