Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370 +44%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1600
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Cypress
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy