Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +1423%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 OEM
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
768
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G94B
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy