NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD P30PH
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM P30PH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 180W)
AMD P30PH 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1206MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (268.8GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
P30PH
+170%
4.94 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1206 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
2100 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
268.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.59 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
154.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.940 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.940 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
308.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
180W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Polaris 20
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
