Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA PG506 242

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA PG506 242

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 24GB VRAM PG506 242 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 242 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1440MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
PG506 242 +464%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 900
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
3584
48
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA100
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy