Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4350 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +1804%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4350 PCI
0.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
80
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV710
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
RV710 PCI (215-0725018)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy