NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5770 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+34%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5770 X2
1.36 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1360 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Juniper
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Juniper XT
(215-0754013)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
