Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon HD 7730

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon HD 7730

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 7730 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 7730 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +197%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7730
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce 900
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
47W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde LE
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy