NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 96% (2331MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
+95%
3.58 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
Radeon Pro W6400
+23%
221
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Navi 24
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
