Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon Pro V5300X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro V5300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro V5300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1201MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V5300X +34%
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
1125 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Baffin
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy