NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1720MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II
+670%
14.09 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
Radeon Pro Vega II
+364%
832
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1574 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
475W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
Vega 20
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
