Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1190MHz vs 1050MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +13%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 900
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
104.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Tobago
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy