Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (2000MHz vs 1188MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +68%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
DG2-128
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy