Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro W9100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +187%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
768
Shading Units
2816
48
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Hawaii
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

90W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy