Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs AMD FirePro S7150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Boost Clock1178MHz
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960
2.413 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +56%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1127 MHz
Base Clock
-
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.70 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
75.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
2.413 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
75.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Tonga
GM206-300-A1
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy