Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1250MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M
2.355 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M +35%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 900M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
Navi 14
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy