NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1150MHz vs 1125MHz)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 2 months late

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 965M

2.355 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh +120%

5.184 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce GTX 965M

1819

GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh +266%

6660

Blender

GeForce GTX 965M

133

GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh +1669%

2354

OctaneBench

GeForce GTX 965M

32

GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh +481%

186

GeForce GTX 965M

VS

GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh

Graphics Card

Jan 2016

Release Date

Mar 2020

GeForce 900M

Generation

GeForce 20 Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

MXM-A (3.0)

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

935 MHz

Base Clock

900 MHz

1150 MHz

Boost Clock

1125 MHz

1253 MHz

Memory Clock

1375 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

80.19GB/s

Bandwidth

352.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

36

1024

Shading Units

2304

64

TMUs

144

32

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

288

-

RT Cores

36

48 KB (per SMM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

36.80 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

72.00 GPixel/s

73.60 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

162.0 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

10.37 TFLOPS

2.355 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

5.184 TFLOPS

73.60 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

162.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown

TDP

115W

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

GM206S

GPU Name

TU106B

N16E-GR-A1

GPU Variant

-

Maxwell 2.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

12 nm

2.94 billion

Transistors

10.8 billion

228 mm²

Die Size

445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

5.2

CUDA

7.5

6.7

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon Pro W6300M

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1900

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon R9 M280X

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4830

Related News

1

Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies

2

NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory

3

Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB

4

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

5

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

6

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

7

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

8

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

9

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

10

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps