Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1006MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (60.80GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX110 +67%
0.515 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2017
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce MX(1xx)
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

978 MHz
Base Clock
-
1006 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
256
Shading Units
112
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.048 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
16.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
515.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
308.0 GFLOPS
16.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM108S
GPU Name
G92
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GT
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy