Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro M5725

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro M5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150 +172%
1.177 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
0.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
M96
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
M96 GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy