Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 65W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (60.80GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150 +282%
1.177 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
112
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.80 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
308.0 GFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
G92
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
N10E-GT
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
65W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy