NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

VS

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1532MHz vs 1125MHz)

Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages

Released 2 years and 11 months late

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce MX150

1.177 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +95%

2.304 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce MX150

988

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +199%

2956

GeForce MX150

VS

GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

Graphics Card

May 2017

Release Date

Apr 2020

GeForce MX

Generation

GeForce 16 Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz

Base Clock

930 MHz

1532 MHz

Boost Clock

1125 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

1250 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

48.06GB/s

Bandwidth

160.0GB/s

Render Config

3

SM Count

16

-

Compute Units

-

384

Shading Units

1024

24

TMUs

64

16

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

512 KB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

36.00 GPixel/s

36.77 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

72.00 GTexel/s

18.38 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

4.608 TFLOPS

1177 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

2.304 TFLOPS

36.77 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

72.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108

GPU Name

TU117

GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)

GPU Variant

N18P-G61-MP2

Pascal

Architecture

Turing

Samsung

Foundry

TSMC

14 nm

Process Size

12 nm

1.8 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

74 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

25W

TDP

30W

-

Suggested PSU

-

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

6.1

CUDA

7.5

6.4

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

2

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 705A

3

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M470X

4

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

5

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel Arc A350M

6

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel Arc Pro A60M

7

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon Pro 555

8

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile

9

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850

10

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro W6170M

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD