Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1531MHz vs 1150MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 965M +200%
2.355 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
GeForce MX230
13
GeForce GTX 965M +146%
32
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2016
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1519 MHz
Base Clock
935 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
GM206S
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy