Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1038MHz vs 797MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.19GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 770M +91%
1.53 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce GTX 770M +58%
114
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
706 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
797 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
96.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
960
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.94 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
63.76 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.530 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
63.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N14E-GS-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy