Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9560 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon E9560 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (1237MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon E9560 PCIe +615%
5.7 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1237 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.58 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
178.1 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.700 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.700 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
356.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
130W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy