Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1038MHz vs 825MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +25%
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy