NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon RX 6300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon RX 6300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon RX 6300M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 131% (2400MHz vs 1038MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6300M
+362%
3.686 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
Radeon RX 6300M
+191%
210
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
32bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.80 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
115.2 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.373 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.686 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Navi 24
-
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XML
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
