Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1594MHz vs 1468MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +882%
12.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Mar 2019
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1531 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.95 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
375.8 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.05 TFLOPS
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.03 TFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
751.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Vega 10
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy