Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1350MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +563%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
52.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
3.333 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1.667 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
52.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Vega 10
N18S-G5
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy