Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX450 25W and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX450 25W 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX450 25W
1.667 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +79%
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2020
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
930 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
1792
56
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
52.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
3.333 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.667 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
52.08 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Amethyst
N18S-G5
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy