Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +1060%
7.127 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 30
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Cayman
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy