Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1762MHz vs 1470MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +150%
6.774 TFLOPS
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 30
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1042 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
6
2304
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
72
Tensor Cores
24
18
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GA107
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy