Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1777MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (130W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB +13%
9.098 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 30
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1552 MHz
Base Clock
-
1777 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
2560
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

56.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
142.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
9.098 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.098 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
142.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GA106-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy