Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1125MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB +478%
4.608 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

757 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
4.608 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GP108B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy