Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1605MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +174%
8.218 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Amethyst
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy