Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
15W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
VSA-101
-
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
180 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy