Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (272.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 289W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 +2435%
15.11 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1830 MHz
Base Clock
-
2460 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2125 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
272.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
3072
Shading Units
240
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
28
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

118.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
236.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
15.11 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.11 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
236.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
289W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
GT200B
AD106-155-A1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy