NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages

Released 8 years and 3 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 119% (2610MHz vs 1190MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

7680 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 +2312%

44.1 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

1.828 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

VS

GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

Graphics Card

Jun 2024

Release Date

Mar 2016

GeForce 40

Generation

GeForce 900

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2340 MHz

Base Clock

1026 MHz

2610 MHz

Boost Clock

1190 MHz

1313 MHz

Memory Clock

1653 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6X

Memory Type

GDDR5

256bit

Memory Bus

128bit

672.3GB/s

Bandwidth

105.8GB/s

Render Config

-

66

SM Count

-

8448

Shading Units

768

264

TMUs

48

96

ROPs

32

264

Tensor Cores

-

66

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SMM)

48 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

250.6 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

38.08 GPixel/s

689.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

57.12 GTexel/s

44.10 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

44.10 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.828 TFLOPS

689.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

57.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

285W

TDP

75W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

AD102

GPU Name

GM206

AD102-175-KEF-A1

GPU Variant

GM206-251-A1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Maxwell 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

28 nm

76.3 billion

Transistors

2.94 billion

609 mm²

Die Size

228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

5.2

6.8

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD FirePro W5100

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon R7 260X

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Related News

1

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

2

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

3

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

4

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

5

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

6

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

7

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

8

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

9

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

10

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early