Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
9568 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +11695%
28.31 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
160
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

163.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
442.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
28.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
28.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
442.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Seymour
GN21-X11
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy