Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W6170M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W6170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro W6170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q +1336%
28.31 TFLOPS
FirePro W6170M
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
896
304
TMUs
56
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

163.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
442.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
28.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
28.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
442.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Emerald
GN21-X11
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy