Home GPU Comparison Intel GMA 3100 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP

Intel GMA 3100 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GMA 3100 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 320SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel GMA 3100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 15W)
AMD Radeon Graphics 320SP 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1400MHz
320 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jan 2020
GMA Graphics
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
FSB
Bus Interface
IGP

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.792 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
896.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
56.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

13W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Bearlake
GPU Name
Renoir
Bearlake-G+ (G33)
GPU Variant
-
Generation 4.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
9.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
156 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy