Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

NVIDIA GRID A100A vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100A and 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 80.13GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1354MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100A +902%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro P620
1.386 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Feb 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1354 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1252 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
80.13GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
6912
Shading Units
512
432
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.66 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.33 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.66 GFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1386 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.33 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

400W
TDP
40W
800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy