Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 249.6GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Lower TDP (235W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +252%
13.89 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Nov 2012
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
2688
432
TMUs
224
192
ROPs
48
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
235W
800 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy