Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K100 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
4416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +4311%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
192
Shading Units
4608
16
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy