Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 295W)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 +2578%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
GRID
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
295W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy