Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
12544 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +1991%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
14080
128
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy