Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q +103%
4.666 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1536
Shading Units
1920
128
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
60W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy