Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K280Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA GRID K280Q vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K280Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +383%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
350W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy