Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA GRID K520 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520 +395%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy