Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q +602%
2.289 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jun 2013
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
130W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK107
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy