Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (15W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q +78%
2.289 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
GRID
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.29GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.560 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
15W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy