CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
VS
NVIDIA GRID K520Q
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (15W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q
+78%
2.289 TFLOPS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1.28 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q
VS
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
GRID
Generation
Tegra
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1067 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.29GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1536
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
32
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.560 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1280 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
640.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
15W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA10B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
294 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
2
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216
3
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA GRID K560Q
4
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
5
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
6
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
7
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 1000 Model IV
8
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA L40
9
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
10
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy